ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024
Real-world patterns of treatment and response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre UK-wide review with UK Renal Oncology Collaborative (UK ROC).
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatments for renal cell carcinoma: NICE Pilot Treatment Pathways Appraisal.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Subsequent systemic therapy initiation after first-line discontinuation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: insights from a Japanese real-world cohort.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Two-Stage Estimation of Overall Survival in the Phase 3 CheckMate 9ER Trial, Adjusting for the Impact of Subsequent Therapy.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- Treatment and Attrition Trends for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Insights from a Dutch nationwide cohort.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Efficacy of cabozantinib and sunitinib for the treatment of intermediate/poor risk renal cell carcinoma based upon UK real-world data.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The introductions of immunotherapy and first-line combinations have led to major changes in systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) options and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Objectives: To evaluate current real-world UK practice in the immunotherapy era looking at survival outcomes by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk stratification and prescribing patterns/drop-off rates of SACT in mRCC. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective multi-institutional cohort of SACT patients for mRCC at 17 centres across the UK from 1 January 2018 and 30 June 2021. Patient characteristics, IMDC risk group and lines of therapy were recorded. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for IMDC groups were analysed. Results: Of the 1319 patients, 22.3%, 52.7% and 24.3% were IMDC group favourable, intermediate and poor, respectively. Across all risk groups and censoring for patients who have not progressed on their current therapy line, 59.2%, 23.5% and 6.3 % of first-line patients with SACT received second-, third- and fourth-line treatments; 40.1%, 33.2% and 44.2%, respectively, did not receive immunotherapy at any stage in their treatment. Median PFS was statistically different by IMDC risk group: 14.0, 8.2 and 4.8 months in the favourable, intermediate and poor groups ( Conclusions: The majority of patients receive only one or two treatment lines in mRCC. The IMDC prognostic risk groups remain valid in the immunotherapy era. A significant group of patients in this cohort did not receive immunotherapy at any stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.