ArticleCase reports in cardiology2026
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Intracoronary Air Embolism During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Case Report and Successful Management.
Article in Case reports in cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Intracoronary Air Embolism During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Case Report and Successful Management.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a 47-year-old woman with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent catheter ablation. During the procedure, real-time ST-segment elevation was observed on surface ECG. An emergency coronary angiography revealed an air embolism in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Intracoronary adenosine was administered, successfully restoring coronary flow (TIMI 3). The procedure was aborted, and the patient was subsequently managed in the coronary care unit due to biventricular cardiogenic shock secondary to myocardial stunning. This case highlights the importance of strict hemodynamic monitoring and prompt recognition and response to uncommon complications during catheter ablation procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.