Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647203›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

BioModelsRAG: A Biological Modeling Assistant Using RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation).

Bhavyahshree Navaneetha Krishnan, Adel Heydarabadipour, Herbert Sauro

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhavyahshree Navaneetha KrishnanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Adel HeydarabadipourDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Herbert SauroDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Funding

TR&D3: Standards and Tools for Simulator Composition and Credibility portalP41EB023912 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Ion I. Moraru, HERBERT M. SAURO · 2018 to 2026
$11.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BioModels database is one of the premier databases for computational models in systems biology. The database contains over 1000 curated models and an even larger number of non-curated models. All the models are stored in the machine-readable format, SBML. Although SBML can be translated into the human readable Antimony format, analyzing the models can still be time consuming. In order to bridge this gap, a LLM (large language model) assistant was created to analyze the BioModels and allow interaction between the user and the model using natural language. By doing so, a user can easily and rapidly extract the salient points in a given model. Our analysis workflow involved 'chunking' BioModels and converting them to plain text using llama3, and then embedding them in a ChromaDB database. The user-provided query was also embedded, and a similarity search was performed between the query and the BioModels in ChromaDB to extract the most relevant BioModels. The BioModels were then used as context to create the most accurate output in the chat between the user and the LLM. This approach greatly minimized the chance of hallucination and kept the LLM focused on the problem at hand. We illustrate the utility of this approach with a number of examples. The code is available at https://github.com/TheBobBob/BioModelsRAG. The website implementation is available at https://biomodelsrag.streamlit.app/.

Indexed as

BioModelsLLMsRetrieval Augmented GenerationSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID41647203
PMCPMC12869393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.