Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025

Case Report: Extending dosing intervals of biologics in adults severe asthma: a case series.

Tomoya Harada, Miyu Nishigami, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Genki Inui, Hiroki Ishikawa, Hiroki Kohno, Yoshihiro Funaki, Tomohiro Sakamoto, Miki Takata, Ryota Okazaki and 3 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tomoya HaradaDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Miyu NishigamiDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Hiroyuki TanakaDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Genki InuiDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Hiroki IshikawaDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Hiroki KohnoDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Yoshihiro FunakiDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Tomohiro SakamotoDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Miki TakataDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Ryota OkazakiDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Masato MoritaDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Shin KitataniDepartment of Respirology, Tottori Prefectural Kousei Hospital, Kurayoshi, Tottori, Japan.
Akira YamasakiDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biological therapies have improved the control of severe asthma. However, biological therapies are expensive. Therefore, the cost-effective use of these medications after achieving improved disease control warrants consideration. Methods: This retrospective case series analyzed 69 adult patients with asthma who received biological therapies at our department between 2009 and 2023. Among them, 11 patients underwent dosing interval extension. We collected data on their clinical characteristics, asthma control status, and changes in clinical parameters after interval extension. Results: At the time of dosing interval extension, the mean patient age was 62.1 years, with 5 female patients. Omalizumab was used in five cases, benralizumab in five, and dupilumab in one. The dosing intervals were extended by 1.5 to 2 times. The median duration from the initiation of biologics to interval extension was 7.0 months, with 6 patients undergoing extension within the first 7 months. One year after extension, asthma exacerbation occurred in only one patient receiving omalizumab. The frequency of exacerbations and the proportion of patients receiving oral corticosteroids (OCS) were decreased. The median ACT score remained at 25, while the median daily OCS dose decreased from 5.0 mg to 4.0 mg (prednisolone equivalent). The median % predicted FEV₁ changed from 84.9% to 78.3%. Conclusions: For patients whose asthma control improves after initiating biological therapy, extending the dosing interval may be a feasible treatment option. Given the retrospective, single-center design and small sample size, these findings are exploratory and generate hypotheses that require validation in larger, prospective studies.

Indexed as

asthmabiological drugscostdose spacingextended interval dosing

Identifiers

PMID41647193
PMCPMC12868160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.