ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2026
Barriers to Screening for Anal Dysplasia and Strategies to Overcome Them.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barriers to anal dyplasia screening are numerous and multifactorial. It is a rare disease, comprising only 2.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. Of the populations at high risk, men who have sex with other men (MSM), especially those living with HIV, represent the most studied high-risk population. Although knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) is relatively high in this population, its link to anal cancer and self-perception of risk of anal cancer in this population remains low. There are little, if any, data on provider knowledge or awareness of anal dysplasia or the high-risk populations that would benefit from screening. Given the recent advent of comprehensive anal cancer screening guidelines by the International Anal Neoplasia Society, this gap in knowledge is not suprising. Even among providers aware of these guidelines, other barriers exist, including possible discomfort discussing anal health, sexual practices, or discomfort in the performance of the screening test. Providers may also face challenges interpreting results of screening tests or finding specialists in high-resolution anoscopy for referral in the instance of a positive screening test. Finally, MSM and persons living with HIV have historically experienced stigmatization within the health care system. These historical underpinnings further complicate efforts to implement screening programs in these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.