Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647131›Full record

ReviewThe journal of climate change and health

Pediatric climate distress: A scoping review and clinical resource.

Jeremy D Wortzel, Ver-Se Denga, Jeshtha Angrish, Larissa Dooley, Iliana Manjón, Sherwin Shabdar, Amy D Lykins, Suzie Cosh, Paul A Bain, Andrew Toyin Olagunju and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jeremy D WortzelBrigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard School of Medicine, 75 Francis Street, Boston MA, 02115, USA.
Ver-Se DengaMcMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, 100 West 5th St, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3K7, Canada.
Jeshtha AngrishDefense Institute of Psychological Research, DRDO, Ministry of Defence, Lucknow Rd, Timarpur, Delhi, 110054, India.
Larissa DooleyClimate Mental Health Network, 1212 S Highland Avenue, Los Angeles CA 90019, USA.
Iliana ManjónUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine- Phoenix, Department of Psychiatry, 475 N. 5th Steet Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Sherwin ShabdarWestern Michigan University School of Medicine, 300 Portage Street, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Amy D LykinsUniversity of New England, School of Psychology, Tablelands Clinical School, 110 Butler St, Armidale NSW 2350, Australia.
Suzie CoshUniversity of New England, School of Psychology, Tablelands Clinical School, 110 Butler St, Armidale NSW 2350, Australia.
Paul A BainCountway Library, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Andrew Toyin OlagunjuMcMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, 100 West 5th St, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3K7, Canada.
James McKowenMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 15 Parkman St 8th Floor Suite 850, Boston MA, 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Climate change is the public health crisis of our time, with young people particularly at risk. Climate change has been associated with increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders. Psychological concerns pertaining to the Earth's future have also been cited as contributing to negative emotions now termed 'climate distress'. While previous reviews have addressed the various ways climate change affects pediatric mental health, this scoping review aims to specifically explore pediatric climate distress and its implications for clinical practice. Methods: 2548 articles were extracted from multiple databases, titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened blinded and in duplicate using the web-based platform Covidence. Quantitative and qualitative original research papers published in English between January 1, 2000 and April 29, 2024 that studied pediatric climate distress were included. Results: Forty-two articles met the inclusion criteria, along with 10 additional grey literature sources. Among quantitative studies, 81 % found that 50 % or more of respondents reported negative climate emotions and 86 % of qualitative studies reported that "all" or "most" respondents expressed negative climate emotions. Additionally, 63 % of studies measuring distress severity reported high distress levels. Therapeutic interventions addressing climate distress were found to be effective and were categorized thematically into three groups: Education-Emotion Focused, Nature-Engagement Based, and Activism-Civic Related. Conclusions: This review shows that while there is a growing body of literature that illustrates how young people have negative emotions pertaining to climate change, there is need for increased diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to clinically address these growing challenges.

Indexed as

Climate changeDistressEco-anxietyMental healthYouth

Identifiers

PMID41647131
PMCPMC12851285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.