Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647094›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2024

Informed consent in endoscopy: Read, understood, or just signed?

Ana Catarina Carvalho, Ricardo Cardoso, Hugo Marcelo Vieira, Américo Silva

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05414435 (Informed Consent in Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05414435 completednot on this map

Informed Consent in Endoscopy: Read, Understood or Merely Signed?

TypeobservationalSponsorCentro Hospitalar Tondela-ViseuRan2021 to 2022Enrolled232ConditionsInformed Consent, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyArmsReading of informed consent form
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Catarina CarvalhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, EPE, Viseu, Portugal.
Ricardo CardosoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, EPE, Viseu, Portugal.
Hugo Marcelo VieiraDepartment of Public Health, Unidade de Saúde Pública ACeS Maia/Valongo, Porto, Portugal.
Américo SilvaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, EPE, Viseu, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Although informed consent is a requirement for all interventional procedures such as those in GI endoscopy, its standardization is a challenge. Very thorough documents have been proposed, but it is unknown whether patients actually read them. We evaluated if patients read and understand informed consent forms and information leaflets for GI endoscopy. Methods: This single-center, prospective, observational study was performed between April 2021 and April 2022 and included adult patients proposed for outpatient elective EGD and colonoscopy. Informed consent forms and information leaflets were mailed to patients, with a small text instruction added to the informed consent form. Before endoscopy, we assessed whether patients adequately read the informed consent form, based on patient signature, table questionnaire completion, and performance of the text instruction. Results: The study included 232 patients (50.6% men; mean age, 63.8 ± 12.76 years). Most had only a basic education (78.0%) and had previously undergone GI endoscopy (90.6%). Of the patients, 86.6% stated they had read the form and 13.4% did not. Although most signed the form (83.6%), only 24.6% adequately read and understood it. No statistically significant association between an adequate reading of the informed consent form and any of the assessed variables was found. Conclusions: Despite the timely provision of information, most patients do not read or adequately understand the provided documents. It is necessary to develop new strategies to enhance patients' involvement in decision-making, thus improving the doctor-patient relationship in obtaining informed consent. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05414435.).

Identifiers

PMID41647094
PMCPMC12850725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.