Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647093›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2024

Clinical impact of delayed plastic biliary stent removal because of the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience from a tertiary ERCP referral center.

Dennis Lim, Steven Gruchy, Angela Tsai, Dana Farina, Geoff Williams, Jennifer Jones, Kevork Peltekian, Navjot Sandila, Ali Kohansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dennis LimXXXX.
Steven GruchyXXXX.
Angela TsaiXXXX.
Dana FarinaXXXX.
Geoff WilliamsXXXX.
Jennifer JonesXXXX.
Kevork PeltekianXXXX.
Navjot SandilaXXXX.
Ali KohansalXXXX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Plastic biliary endoprosthesis is widely used because of its high efficacy and low cost. Delays in the removal or exchange of plastic biliary stents may lead to stent occlusion and subsequent sepsis, Methods: All individuals who had ERCP-guided plastic biliary stent placement in the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia, between December 2019 and March 2022 were included. Stent lifespan was defined as days between stent deployment and removal. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to represent the duration of stent patency. Only 10F-diameter stents were studied. Linear regression was used to analyze possible predictors of stent-related adverse events. Results: In total, 286 cases were analyzed, of which 187 had delayed stent removal. Overall, 216 stents were removed without adverse events; 21 cases required urgent reintervention for adverse events; and in 26 cases, patients died of non-stent-related causes. Twenty-one stents had fully migrated out without causing adverse events. There was no difference in overall adverse events between the nondelayed versus delayed groups (23.2% vs 21.4%; odds ratio [OR], 0.899). Stent adverse events and emergent removal were marginally increased, at an OR of 1.21 and OR of 1.18, respectively, in indications related to stone disease. Conclusions: A significant increase was not observed in stent-related adverse events in individuals with stents removed after 90 days. Plastic biliary stent longevity may be longer than previously thought. Our findings suggest that the majority of inserted plastic biliary stents remain patent up to 6 months without adverse outcomes. Larger studies are required to better characterize other predictors of biliary stent obstruction.

Identifiers

PMID41647093
PMCPMC12850827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.