Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647084›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2024

General anesthesia and/or deep hypnotic state in propofol-based conscious sedation for endoscopy.

Halim Bou Daher, Ali El Mokahal, Mohamad Ali Ibrahim, Rana Yamout, Nour Hochaimi, Chakib Ayoub, Yasser H Shaib, Ala I Sharara

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07168135 (Effect of Discontinuing Propofol Anesthesia After Cecal Intubation on Patient's Psychomotor Recovery Following Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07168135 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Discontinuing Propofol Anesthesia After Cecal Intubation on Patient's Psychomotor Recovery Following Colonoscopy: A Prospective Two-Arm Parallel Randomized Double-Blind Interventional Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterRan2025 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsProcedural Sedation, Colonoscopy, Cecal Intubation Success Rate, Propofol Adverse ReactionArmspropofol (drug)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Halim Bou DaherDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ali El MokahalDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamad Ali IbrahimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rana YamoutDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nour HochaimiDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Chakib AyoubDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Yasser H ShaibDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ala I ShararaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Although moderate sedation (defined as a depression of consciousness with the retention of the ability to respond purposefully to verbal commands) is the goal in endoscopy, the exact depth of sedation reached in practice has not been well described. Methods: In this prospective cohort study using bispectral index (BIS) monitoring to assess the depth of propofol-based sedation for same-day bidirectional endoscopy, we measured the incidence and time spent with a BIS score <60, corresponding to general anesthesia (GA) with a low probability of consciousness, and <40, corresponding to a deep hypnotic state, as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Results: Of 95 consecutive patients enrolled, 84 patients (88%) had a BIS score <60 and 12 patients (12.6%) a BIS score <40. The mean time patients spent under GA and in a deep hypnotic state was 9.1 ± 6.9 and 3.0 ± 2.0 minutes, respectively, representing 38% and 12.6%, respectively, of the total sedation time. Significant alcohol use (defined as >7 drinks per week) was the only predictor for dips in the BIS score <40 (16.7% of those who experienced dips were heavy alcohol users compared with 2.4% of those who did not experience dips, Conclusions: An important proportion of patients experience periods of GA and/or a deep hypnotic state during endoscopy. However, no predictive factors could be identified. Further studies are required to identify predictors and consequences of deep sedation and improved methods of monitoring.

Identifiers

PMID41647084
PMCPMC12851054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.