Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647060›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026

Radiographers' self-perceived knowledge regarding infection control in the Free State province during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ida-Keshia Sebelego, Je'nine Horn-Lodewyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ida-Keshia SebelegoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4362-1216
Je'nine Horn-LodewykPacific Radiology, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-2321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiographers are regarded as essential healthcare workers. Therefore, knowledge and training regarding infection control are vital to minimise the potential risk of infections to patients. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the self-perceived knowledge of infection control among qualified radiographers and diagnostic radiography students. Setting: The study was conducted in three public sector radiology departments during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: A quantitative questionnaire was completed by 106 participants comprising radiographers and students of diagnostic radiography. Data were analysed using SAS version 9.4. The Wilcoxon two-sample and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to calculate the difference between the median values and to determine the significant differences between the experience, training cycle of infection knowledge, and knowledge of the participants. Results: Only 30.2% ( Conclusion: Considering the findings, radiographers' and student radiographers' knowledge of infection control requires improvement. An infection control audit accompanied by in-service training on infection control might encourage radiographers to comply with infection control guidelines and enhance their knowledge. Contribution: While infection control has been widely studied, fewer studies focus specifically on diagnostic radiography students and radiographers, despite their direct patient contact and exposure to infection risks. The study provides much-needed data for this under-researched group.

Indexed as

diagnostic radiography studentsinfection controlknowledgequalified radiographerstraining

Identifiers

PMID41647060
PMCPMC12869448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.