ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Integration of palliative care into South Africa's health system: A before and after implementation study.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Palliative care needs at a South African district hospital: A descriptive study using supportive and palliative care indicators tool South Africa.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Providing palliative care (PC) is an ethical obligation, and health systems must ensure access for all patients with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. South Africa's National Policy Framework and Strategy for Palliative Care mandates integration into public services. Aim: To assess integration of PC services, previously neglected, before and 2 years after policy implementation. Setting: South Africa's Cape Metro District. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study compared baseline (March 2019-June 2019) and follow-up (March 2021-June 2021) via desktop and document review. Fifteen documents and quantitative changes in deidentified morphine use, as a tracer for outpatient PC pain control, and International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 coding, as a proxy for PC service availability, were reviewed. Other key measures included financing (number of beds, funding per bed), planning and service delivery (care pathways, referral process). Results: Palliative care was partially integrated into primary care. Indicators of policy adoption included an increased number of PC beds in intermediate care facilities, significant growth in healthcare professionals trained in PC and increased morphine usage in some sub-districts. However, integration remained uneven across the district. Conclusion: Integrating PC into an already overburdened health system is challenging. Further integration of PC is needed, together with training tailored for diverse professionals. Effective practices in some subdistricts of the region, such as optimised morphine prescribing and streamlined referral pathways, could serve as models for subdistricts where integration is less advanced. Contribution: The study documents positive changes following policy implementation and underscores the importance of strong project management and resource mobilisation for successful integration of complex services like PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.