Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647021›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Age matters in orthodontics: divergent motivations, perfectionism, and patient-clinician discord in treatment need assessment.

Guo Zhao, Fengjie Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guo ZhaoDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fengjie ZhuDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding age-related differences in the psychological aspects of orthodontic treatment is crucial for patient-centered care. This study compared treatment motivation, psychosocial impact, and perfectionism between child and adult patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 306 orthodontic patients (223 children, 83 adults) completed validated questionnaires assessing motivation, psychosocial impact (PIDAQ), and perfectionism (FMPS). Patient-perceived aesthetic need (IOTN-AC) and orthodontist-evaluated clinical need (IOTN-DHC) were recorded. Results: Adults reported significantly higher total treatment motivation ( Conclusion: Adult orthodontic patients experience a greater psychosocial burden and distinct motivational drivers compared to children. Treatment motivation is primarily driven by psychosocial distress, not clinical severity, highlighting the need for clinicians to prioritize patient-reported outcomes and address perception gaps to deliver effective, patient-centered care.

Indexed as

orthodonticspediatricsperfectionismpsychologysurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41647021
PMCPMC12867885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.