Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646995›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2023

Quality of recovery and pre-existing impaired cognition in patients undergoing advanced GI endoscopic procedures with patient-controlled sedation: a prospective observational cohort study.

Sara Lyckner, Michelle S Chew, Andreas Nilsson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara LycknerDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences.
Michelle S ChewDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences.
Andreas NilssonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Advanced GI endoscopy (GIE) procedures are common, and many patients undergoing these procedures are elderly with comorbidities. The procedures are commonly conducted in day surgery, and good postprocedural recovery is assumed. How patients recover has been poorly studied, however. The primary aim of this study was to describe the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing advanced GIE procedures with patient-controlled sedation. A secondary aim was to evaluate if impaired preprocedural cognitive ability was an independent risk for lack of recovery. Methods: Measurements were conducted by using the 15-item QoR instrument (QoR-15) before the GIE procedure (baseline) and on days 1 and 5 postprocedure. Postprocedural recovery scores were compared versus baseline scores. Lack of recovery was defined as any decrease in the QoR-15 score compared with baseline. Cognitive ability was assessed by using the clock-in-the-box test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to test the independent association between preprocedural cognitive impairment and lack of recovery. Results: A total of 93 patients were included in the study. The QoR-15 score significantly improved at postprocedure day 1 ( Conclusions: QoR significantly improved for a majority of patients by day 1 after advanced GIE procedures. However, one-third of patients displayed a lack of recovery. We highlight the need for improved strategies to increase quality of postendoscopic recovery and the recognition of preoperative cognitive impairment.

Identifiers

PMID41646995
PMCPMC12851060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.