ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2023
Quality of recovery and pre-existing impaired cognition in patients undergoing advanced GI endoscopic procedures with patient-controlled sedation: a prospective observational cohort study.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Short-term postoperative neurocognitive safety and recovery profiles of remimazolam tosilate combined with flumazenil vs. propofol in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal treatment: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Precision Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Older Adults: Brain Vulnerability and Recovery.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2025
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Advanced GI endoscopy (GIE) procedures are common, and many patients undergoing these procedures are elderly with comorbidities. The procedures are commonly conducted in day surgery, and good postprocedural recovery is assumed. How patients recover has been poorly studied, however. The primary aim of this study was to describe the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing advanced GIE procedures with patient-controlled sedation. A secondary aim was to evaluate if impaired preprocedural cognitive ability was an independent risk for lack of recovery. Methods: Measurements were conducted by using the 15-item QoR instrument (QoR-15) before the GIE procedure (baseline) and on days 1 and 5 postprocedure. Postprocedural recovery scores were compared versus baseline scores. Lack of recovery was defined as any decrease in the QoR-15 score compared with baseline. Cognitive ability was assessed by using the clock-in-the-box test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to test the independent association between preprocedural cognitive impairment and lack of recovery. Results: A total of 93 patients were included in the study. The QoR-15 score significantly improved at postprocedure day 1 ( Conclusions: QoR significantly improved for a majority of patients by day 1 after advanced GIE procedures. However, one-third of patients displayed a lack of recovery. We highlight the need for improved strategies to increase quality of postendoscopic recovery and the recognition of preoperative cognitive impairment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.