ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024
Gastric cancer hospital-based registry: real-world gastric cancer data from Latin America and Europe.
Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incomplete TNM Documentation in Gastric Cancer: Frequency, Phenotype, and Treatment Allocation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Ligustilide: A Phytochemical with Potential in Combating Cancer Development and Progression-A Comprehensive and Critical Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological Profiles and Survival Outcomes of Patients with Gastric Cancer According to the Borrmann Endoscopic Classification: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Dietary Components Associated with the Risk of Gastric Cancer in the Latin American Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- TrimmedTheranostics · 2025Article
- Metastatic gastric cancer in fit patients-a practical algorithm of treatment sequencing from the Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours (GTG).Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide. Epidemiological, clinical, and molecular features significantly impact patient outcomes. In regions lacking a national gastric cancer registry, hospital-based registries can provide crucial data that may aid in planning therapeutic strategies for the disease. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort design was carried out in European Union (EU) and Latin American (LATAM) countries participating in the LEGACy project. Survival estimates were determined using actuarial Kaplan-Meier curves. Comparison was carried out with the log-rank test, and differences were considered statistically significant for Results: A total of 689 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from November 2018 to November 2019 were included. Both cohorts had the body as the most common site reported (34.4% for EU and 51% for LATAM). The most used method for staging was computed tomography for both cohorts, although 6.9% of the LATAM population had positron emission tomography/computed tomography instead. Intestinal histological subtype was the most common (41.9% and 46.3% reported by EU and LATAM), while diffuse subtype was 44.9% for the LATAM and 21.3% for the EU population. Among patients tested for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), 12.5% were positive in the EU cohort and 13.8% in the LATAM cohort. For both cohorts, the most common site of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity was the gastroesophageal junction. Systemic treatment with curative intention was indicated in 50.7% in the EU cohort and 46.4% of the LATAM cohort. The most frequent scheme indicated for both the localized and the advanced setting was platinum-based (42.6% and 84.8% for EU and LATAM). Considering both cohorts, only 14.4% of the patients received second-line treatment, and 3% received a third-line treatment. After using Cox regression analysis, no difference in overall survival was reported, with a median of 10.9 months. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of hospital-based registry analysis, our study has provided valuable insights into clinical characteristics and treatment approaches of EU and LATAM populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.