Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646952›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024

Gastric cancer hospital-based registry: real-world gastric cancer data from Latin America and Europe.

B Freile, T S van Schooten, S Derks, F Carneiro, C Figueiredo, R Barros, C Gauna, R Pereira, M Romero, A Riquelme and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. TrimmedTheranostics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

B FreileInstituto Alexander Fleming (IAF), Medical Oncology Department, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
T S van SchootenAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S DerksAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F CarneiroInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
C FigueiredoInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
R BarrosInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
C GaunaInstituto de Previsión Social, Medical Oncology Department, GenPat, Asunción.
R PereiraInstituto de Previsión Social, Medical Oncology Department, GenPat, Asunción.
M RomeroInstituto de Previsión Social, Medical Gastroenterology Department, GenPat, Asunción, Paraguay.
A RiquelmePontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, (PUC), Gastroenterology Departament, Santiago.
M GarridoUniversidad Mayor, Medicine School, Precision Oncology Center, Santiago.
G OwenPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Santiago, Chile.
E Ruiz-GarcíaInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Translational Medicine Laboratory & GI Cancer Department, Mexico City.
E A Fernández-FigueroaInstituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, México City.
A Hernández-GuerreroInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Endoscopy Department, México City, Mexico.
M AlsinaValld'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Medical Oncology Department, Barcelona.
C ViaplanaValld'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Medical Oncology Department, Barcelona.
M DiezValld'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Medical Oncology Department, Barcelona.
S Romero-AlcaideInstituto Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA (INCLIVA), CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia.
E Jiménez-MartíUniversity of Valencia, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Valencia, Spain.
J M O'ConnorInstituto Alexander Fleming (IAF), Medical Oncology Department, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A CervantesInstituto Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA (INCLIVA), CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia.
F EstesoInstituto Alexander Fleming (IAF), Medical Oncology Department, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
T Fleitas KanonnikoffInstituto Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA (INCLIVA), CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide. Epidemiological, clinical, and molecular features significantly impact patient outcomes. In regions lacking a national gastric cancer registry, hospital-based registries can provide crucial data that may aid in planning therapeutic strategies for the disease. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort design was carried out in European Union (EU) and Latin American (LATAM) countries participating in the LEGACy project. Survival estimates were determined using actuarial Kaplan-Meier curves. Comparison was carried out with the log-rank test, and differences were considered statistically significant for Results: A total of 689 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from November 2018 to November 2019 were included. Both cohorts had the body as the most common site reported (34.4% for EU and 51% for LATAM). The most used method for staging was computed tomography for both cohorts, although 6.9% of the LATAM population had positron emission tomography/computed tomography instead. Intestinal histological subtype was the most common (41.9% and 46.3% reported by EU and LATAM), while diffuse subtype was 44.9% for the LATAM and 21.3% for the EU population. Among patients tested for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), 12.5% were positive in the EU cohort and 13.8% in the LATAM cohort. For both cohorts, the most common site of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity was the gastroesophageal junction. Systemic treatment with curative intention was indicated in 50.7% in the EU cohort and 46.4% of the LATAM cohort. The most frequent scheme indicated for both the localized and the advanced setting was platinum-based (42.6% and 84.8% for EU and LATAM). Considering both cohorts, only 14.4% of the patients received second-line treatment, and 3% received a third-line treatment. After using Cox regression analysis, no difference in overall survival was reported, with a median of 10.9 months. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of hospital-based registry analysis, our study has provided valuable insights into clinical characteristics and treatment approaches of EU and LATAM populations.

Indexed as

epidemiologyEuropegastric cancerLatin Americanreal world

Identifiers

PMID41646952
PMCPMC12836518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.