ReviewESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024
Prognostic markers in oesophageal and gastric cancer review. Are they ready for clinical practice?
Review in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Association of pathological response with long-term survival after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and individual-patient-data meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy of esophageal, GEJ and gastric tumorsMagyar onkologia · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oesophageal and gastric cancer outcomes remain poor despite the introduction of new treatments in the past decade. Most patients subjected to chemotherapy or surgery do not, in the long term, benefit from treatment but suffer side-effects. Although next-generation sequencing has accelerated the identification of various genomic aberrations, most have yet to be applied to routine clinical practice. Here, we review published data from systemic reviews and meta-analyses from the past 8 years reporting prognostic markers and why these have not gained traction in clinical practice and how we can improve on this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.