Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646925›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The more the better? The non-linear effect of workload on workplace well-being.

Juan Liang, Wenxin Zhou, Bibo Xu, Hai Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan LiangDepartment of Psychology, Hubei University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wenxin ZhouDepartment of Psychology, Hubei University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bibo XuDepartment of Psychology, Hubei University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hai JiangParty School of CPC Wuhan Committee, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is unclear what level of workload is best for workplace well-being, in part because researchers have only tested linear relationships. We tested an inverted U-shaped model in which workplace well-being is optimal at a moderate level of workload. The mediation effect of autonomous motivation were also tested. Methods: We conducted two studies with employees. Study 1 ( Results: The data were analyzed using non-linear analytical techniques and mediation analyses conducted with the PROCESS macro. The results of both studies showed a U-shaped curve, but contrary to expectations, the curve was positive rather than inverted: an increase in workload from low to moderate was associated with decreased workplace well-being, but an increase in workload from moderate to high was associated with increased workplace well-being. The mediation effect of autonomous motivation emerged in study 1, but not Study 2. Discussion: These results suggest that employees should be given a moderate workload that can be increased, rather than starting with a low workload.

Indexed as

autonomous motivationexperience sampling methodology (ESM)non-linear effectsworkloadworkplace well-being

Identifiers

PMID41646925
PMCPMC12867806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.