Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646921›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Testing the effect of stimulus onset asynchrony on auditory attention using the attention network test.

Tianfang Han, Arianna N LaCroix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tianfang Han *Department of Psychology and Communication, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States.
Arianna N LaCroix *Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Attention Network Test (ANT) is a widely used paradigm for assessing the efficiency of attentional subsystems. Although most ANT implementations rely on visual cues and stimuli, extending the ANT to the auditory domain is important for advancing theories of modality-specific attention and for enabling assessment in populations with visual impairments. Methods: The present study adapted an auditory version of the ANT to examine how stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) modulates alerting, orienting, and executive control attention. Participants completed a duration discrimination task in which they judged whether the first of two tones (the target) was short or long while ignoring the second tone (the flanker). Trials were preceded by one of three cues: no cue, an alerting cue (pink noise), or an orienting cue (pink noise paired with a target-matching pure tone). SOAs were either 400 ms or 900 ms. Results: The task elicited robust executive control effects, with slower and less accurate responses on incongruent compared to congruent trials, as well as reliable orienting effects, with faster responses following orienting versus neutral cues. In contrast, the alerting effect was not significant. However, alerting interacted with executive control: congruency effects were reduced following alerting cues, a pattern opposite to that observed in the visual ANT but consistent with prior auditory work. SOA further modulated performance, with evidence that alerting cues were more effective at shorter intervals, whereas orienting cues exerted greater influence at longer intervals. Discussion: These findings support the feasibility and promise of an auditory ANT while highlighting important temporal constraints on auditory attention. Future work will be needed to refine the task to better capture the dynamic interplay among attentional networks in the auditory domain.

Indexed as

alertingattentional networksauditory attentionexecutive controlforeperiodorientingstimulus onset asynchrony

Identifiers

PMID41646921
PMCPMC12867919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.