Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646910›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Willingness to wait covaries with endogenous variation in cortisol.

Evgeniya Lukinova, Jeffrey C Erlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evgeniya LukinovaNYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Jeffrey C ErlichNYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress is a normal part of our everyday lives, alerting us to changes in our environment and working as an early warning system. However, when stress is prolonged, it can become harmful. The deleterious effects of stress on brain function are well established: chronic stress significantly impairs cognitive function, reducing our ability to solve problems and regulate behavior. Therefore, it may lead to more challenges that can further exacerbate stress. An important class of decisions made under stress includes those between rewards delivered immediately and those delivered in the future. Not considering or devaluing future outcomes (delay discounting) can result in adverse outcomes, such as not buying health insurance, gambling, or drug use. To date, however, little is known about how chronic stress influences economic decisions that differ in the timing of outcome delivery. A handful of studies suggest that increased stress may lead to more impulsive choices in subjects of average socioeconomic status and stress levels. In this study, we addressed this gap by using a multi-session design to determine whether chronic stress measures (via questionnaires, saliva, and hair samples) are associated with economic choices across different time scales within subject (

Indexed as

chronic stresscortisoldelay discountingpostponingwaiting

Identifiers

PMID41646910
PMCPMC12869316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.