SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
A bibliometric exploration of affective factors in mathematics education: research trends, thematic evolution, and topic modeling.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to examine research trends in the field of affective factors in mathematics education between 1978 and 2025 using trend topic analysis. A total of 2,587 articles systematically collected from the Web of Science and Scopus databases were analyzed using topic modeling, hierarchical clustering, and multidimensional scaling techniques. The findings reveal that the volume of research in the field has steadily increased, but there has been a shift in thematic focus from broad topics to more specific and contextual areas. While "math anxiety" emerged as the most dominant research focus, teachers' affective characteristics (Topic 4) and math anxiety (Topic 6) were the fastest growing themes in recent years. In contrast, the intersection of technology and materials with affective factors (Topic 1) and positive psychology-focused concepts (enjoyment, curiosity, flow) have been insufficiently researched. Hierarchical clustering showed that the topics fell into two main clusters: teaching/achievement-focused (Topics 2, 4, 5, 6) and context-factor-focused (Topics 1, 3, 7). The study highlights the asymmetric distribution and research gaps in the field, suggesting that future studies should focus on areas such as positive psychology, integrated theoretical models, and technology-based interventions. Furthermore, the importance of teacher training and math anxiety intervention programs is emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.