ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
The HIV-treatment-as-prevention adoption cascade among U.S. men and gender-minority individuals who have sex with men.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV treatment can suppress viral load and prevent transmission between sex partners, a strategy known as treatment as prevention (TasP). TasP is key for ending the HIV epidemic, and it is important to understand its adoption among priority populations. We examined the TasP adoption cascade using cross-sectional survey data from 1443 U.S. men and transgender, gender-nonconforming, and nonbinary individuals who reported having sex with men. Most participants (82.4%; n = 1189/1443) reported prior awareness of TasP, but only 52.6% of them (n = 625/1189) perceived it as effective at preventing HIV transmission. Of those, 83.8% (n = 524/625) indicated being willing to rely on TasP, among whom 30.2% (n = 158/524) reported having recently done so. Among participants aware of TasP, we compared those who perceived it as effective to those who did not. Participants who did not have HIV and never used PrEP were less likely to agree with TasP's effectiveness than those who had used PrEP or had HIV. Those who had learned about TasP from a sex partner or who had a partner of different HIV status were more likely to perceive it as effective. TasP promotion appears to have achieved broad awareness, but future efforts should aim at increasing the understanding of its effectiveness, especially among those not connected to HIV-related services, organizations, or communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.