Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646818›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

The HIV-treatment-as-prevention adoption cascade among U.S. men and gender-minority individuals who have sex with men.

Étienne Meunier, Daniel Sauermilch

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Étienne MeunierNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, NY, 11101.ORCID 0000-0002-2810-8633
Daniel SauermilchPsychology Department, Long Island University, Brooklyn, 11201.ORCID 0000-0002-3769-2368

Funding

Acceptability of HIV Treatment as Prevention among MSMR21MD014701 · NIMHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MEUNIER, ETIENNE, SIEGEL, KAROLYNN · 2020 to 2021
$458k
NIMHD NIH HHS R21 MD014701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV treatment can suppress viral load and prevent transmission between sex partners, a strategy known as treatment as prevention (TasP). TasP is key for ending the HIV epidemic, and it is important to understand its adoption among priority populations. We examined the TasP adoption cascade using cross-sectional survey data from 1443 U.S. men and transgender, gender-nonconforming, and nonbinary individuals who reported having sex with men. Most participants (82.4%; n = 1189/1443) reported prior awareness of TasP, but only 52.6% of them (n = 625/1189) perceived it as effective at preventing HIV transmission. Of those, 83.8% (n = 524/625) indicated being willing to rely on TasP, among whom 30.2% (n = 158/524) reported having recently done so. Among participants aware of TasP, we compared those who perceived it as effective to those who did not. Participants who did not have HIV and never used PrEP were less likely to agree with TasP's effectiveness than those who had used PrEP or had HIV. Those who had learned about TasP from a sex partner or who had a partner of different HIV status were more likely to perceive it as effective. TasP promotion appears to have achieved broad awareness, but future efforts should aim at increasing the understanding of its effectiveness, especially among those not connected to HIV-related services, organizations, or communities.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth SurveysHIVPrecaution Adoption Process ModelSexual and Gender MinoritiesTreatment as PreventionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41646818
PMCPMC12870576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.