Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646767›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Scaling Biomedical Knowledge Graph Retrieval for Interpretable Reasoning: Applications to Clinical Diagnosis Prediction.

He Cheng, Yifu Wu, Saksham Khatwani, Maya Kruse, Dmitriy Dligach, Timothy A Miller, Majid Afshar, Yanjun Gao

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

He ChengUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Yifu WuUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Saksham KhatwaniUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Maya KruseUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Dmitriy DligachLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Timothy A MillerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Majid AfsharUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Yanjun GaoUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Developing and Evaluating Multi-Modal Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Models for Automated Diagnosis GenerationR00LM014308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Yanjun Gao · 2024 to 2026
$726k
NLM NIH HHS R00 LM014308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical knowledge graphs (KGs) organize molecular mechanisms, biological pathways, and clinical concepts into structured representations that support diagnostic reasoning. As these graphs grow in scale and connectivity, scalable and interpretable multi-hop retrieval over deep biomedical graph structures has become a major computational bottleneck. We present LogosKG, a hardware-optimized retrieval system that enables efficient k-hop traversal over very large biomedical KGs using symbolic graph formulations and hardware-efficient execution. By integrating degree-aware partitioning, cross-partition routing, and on-demand caching, LogosKG scales to billion-edge graphs while preserving retrieval fidelity. Experiments demonstrate substantial efficiency improvements over CPU- and GPU-based baselines. Using diagnosis-oriented retrieval workloads as a downstream case study, we show that scalable access to deep, high-hop biomedical graph structures enables interpretable diagnostic evidence propagation. A clinician-aligned LLM-as-judge evaluation further indicates that high-hop KG retrieval improves reasoning quality in terms of accuracy, comprehensibility, and succinctness, underscoring the value of deep graph retrieval for diagnostic reasoning.

Identifiers

PMID41646767
PMCPMC12870703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.