Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646733›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Time-series ECG Imputation Using a Pattern-Based Masking Framework.

Sukardi Suba, Alexander Novak, Xiaojuan Xia, Salah S Al-Zaiti, Michele M Pelter

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sukardi SubaSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-5720
Alexander NovakGoergen Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Xiaojuan XiaClinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-0374
Salah S Al-ZaitiSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-6862-0658
Michele M PelterDepartment of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9456-228X

Funding

COMPARE Study: electroCardiographic evaluatiOn of ischeMia comParing invAsive toR21NR011202 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI PELTER, MICHELE M. · 2010 to 2011
$375k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of continuous ECG monitoring has become an integral part of modern hospital-based care. However, missing data presents significant challenges in deploying real-time ECG-based predictive systems. Research on the implementation of imputation techniques on time-series ECG is limited. Furthermore, the performance of imputation techniques is typically benchmarked using random masking, which may not reflect the real-world missingness patterns encountered in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and benchmark a range of imputation methods, from conventional statistical approaches to state-of-the-art deep learning models, using continuous ECG time-series data under different missingness conditions, including both random (conventional) and observed pattern-based (realistic) missingness. Time-domain features were extracted from continuous 12-lead Holter recordings (ranging from 2.5 to 4 hours per patient) from a pilot cohort of 40 patients. Missingness was introduced using random and pattern-based masking. We compared seven imputation methods: global mean, linear interpolation,

Indexed as

electrocardiogramimputation modelmachine learningtime series

Identifiers

PMID41646733
PMCPMC12870555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.