ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Social Support, Traditional Care Practices, and Mental Health in Rural Ecuadorian Youth.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiety and depression account for a growing share of disability among adolescents and young adults globally, yet mental-health research and interventions focus primarily on clinical services, despite many in rural low- and middle-income settings relying on informal and culturally embedded systems of care. Using data from 488 emerging adults in a floriculture-intensive rural region of Ecuador, we quantified how ancestral medicine use and access to social support relate to anxiety and depression symptoms in a setting where formal mental-health care is limited. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were common (45% and 32%, respectively). Greater access to social support was strongly associated with lower depression scores and reduced odds of depressive symptoms, whereas associations with anxiety were weaker and more variable. In contrast, ancestral medicine use was associated with higher anxiety but showed no clear association with depression, indicating engagement with ancestral medicine as a care-seeking response to elevated psychological distress within a pluralistic care ecology rather than evidence of symptom alleviation. In contrast, access to social support was strongly associated with lower depression and reduced odds of depressive symptoms, with effects concentrated among males and among individuals reporting high relationship satisfaction and low loneliness. Pre-existing health conditions did not materially modify these associations. These patterns indicate that relationship quality governs whether access to social support translates into psychological protection, rather than social support operating as a uniformly protective exposure. These findings reframe youth mental health in rural agricultural settings as shaped less by engagement with specific therapeutic practices than by the structure and quality of social relationships, highlighting social support as a dominant correlate of resilience and ancestral medicine use as a marker of unmet mental-health need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.