ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Multi-ancestry epigenome wide association study of generalized anxiety disorder.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic studies face persistent challenges related to small sample sizes, particularly when using epigenome-wide array technologies. Presumably it is this limitation that has hindered the discovery of replicable and robust findings, much like the early struggles of genome-wide association studies. To address this gap, we conducted one of the largest epigenetic investigations of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) using 43,504 participant's data from the Million Veteran Program. Our analysis assessed differential DNA methylation between GAD cases and controls across three major genetic ancestry groups: European (EUR), African (AFR), and Latin American (AMR). We identified 49 CpG sites reaching epigenome-wide significance across these ancestries. However, when controlling for smoking either by adjusting for smoking status or restricting analyses to non-smokers in the EUR group only 2 and 5 significant CpG sites remained significant, respectively. To explore the predictive utility of these findings, we constructed methylation risk scores using a clumping and correlation method. The scores showed significant association with GAD phenotype in the leave-one out cross-validation within the MVP cohort but failed to replicate the association in an independent sample from Scotland. This may reflect insufficient power in the follow-up cohort, the effects of unmeasured confounding variables, or other unmeasured heterogeneity. Our findings underscore both the promise and the ongoing limitations of large-scale epigenetic studies, particularly the need for replication efforts and improved control of environmental confounders. Continued expansion of sample sizes, stratified analyses by ancestry, and careful consideration of lifestyle-related and other covariates will be essential in advancing the reliability and interpretability of peripheral epigenetic markers in psychiatric phenotypes like GAD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.