Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646688›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Multi-ancestry epigenome wide association study of generalized anxiety disorder.

Priya Gupta, Shengxin Liu, Marco Galimberti, Sarah Beck, Keyrun Adhikari, Cecilia Dao, Yaira Z Nunez, Cassie Overstreet, Uri Bright, VA Million Veteran Program and 5 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Priya GuptaDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Shengxin LiuDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Marco GalimbertiDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6052-156X
Sarah BeckDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Keyrun AdhikariDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cecilia DaoDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yaira Z NunezDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cassie OverstreetDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Uri BrightDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-9102-7804
VA Million Veteran Program
Murray B SteinDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-2871
Gita A PathakInstitute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-3943-0895
Xueyi ShenDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0538-4774
Joel GelernterDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-1859
Daniel F LeveyDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-9569

Funding

Expanding Genetic Understanding of Depression, Anxiety, and their TreatmentsR01MH133728 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JOEL GELERNTER, MURRAY B. STEIN · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
BLRD VA I01 BX006482BLRD VA IK2 BX005058NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic studies face persistent challenges related to small sample sizes, particularly when using epigenome-wide array technologies. Presumably it is this limitation that has hindered the discovery of replicable and robust findings, much like the early struggles of genome-wide association studies. To address this gap, we conducted one of the largest epigenetic investigations of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) using 43,504 participant's data from the Million Veteran Program. Our analysis assessed differential DNA methylation between GAD cases and controls across three major genetic ancestry groups: European (EUR), African (AFR), and Latin American (AMR). We identified 49 CpG sites reaching epigenome-wide significance across these ancestries. However, when controlling for smoking either by adjusting for smoking status or restricting analyses to non-smokers in the EUR group only 2 and 5 significant CpG sites remained significant, respectively. To explore the predictive utility of these findings, we constructed methylation risk scores using a clumping and correlation method. The scores showed significant association with GAD phenotype in the leave-one out cross-validation within the MVP cohort but failed to replicate the association in an independent sample from Scotland. This may reflect insufficient power in the follow-up cohort, the effects of unmeasured confounding variables, or other unmeasured heterogeneity. Our findings underscore both the promise and the ongoing limitations of large-scale epigenetic studies, particularly the need for replication efforts and improved control of environmental confounders. Continued expansion of sample sizes, stratified analyses by ancestry, and careful consideration of lifestyle-related and other covariates will be essential in advancing the reliability and interpretability of peripheral epigenetic markers in psychiatric phenotypes like GAD.

Identifiers

PMID41646688
PMCPMC12870643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.