Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646659›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Modulation of Posterior Insula Selectively Enhances Nociceptive Sensory Gating in Humans.

Gabriel Isaac, Aditya Kapoor, Andrew Strohman, Wynn Legon

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel IsaacSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-7892-1788
Aditya KapoorFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-5941-4142
Andrew StrohmanSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Wynn LegonSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8761-3496

Funding

High resolution interrogation of the insula in mechanisms of chronic painR21AT012247 · NCCIH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI LEGON, WYNN · 2023 to 2024
$466k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT012247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory gating - the brain's ability to filter out repetitive sensory input - is essential for preventing sensory overload. Impaired gating is frequently observed in nociplastic and other chronic overlapping pain conditions, yet the specific brain regions supporting this inhibitory process in humans remains unclear. Neuroimaging studies examining pain processing implicate the anterior insula (AI), posterior insula (PI), and anterior mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC), but their deeper locations limit direct mechanistic testing using conventional non-invasive techniques. Here, we leveraged low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), a novel non-invasive neuromodulation method with high depth-penetration and millimeter resolution, to examine the contributions of the AI, PI, and aMCC to sensory gating of nociceptive stimuli. Twelve healthy adults completed four counterbalanced visits of a paired-pulse contact heat evoked potential (CHEP) paradigm while receiving LIFU targeted to each region or an active sham. Using surface electroencephalography (EEG), placed at site Cz, we quantified the peak-to-peak (P2P) amplitude of the cortical response to the first stimulus (S1), the second stimulus (S2), and used the ratio of the response to each stimulus (S2/S1 ratio) as an index of sensory gating. Subjective ratings of pain intensity to the second stimulus were also recorded. Results demonstrated that all subjects displayed sensory gating at baseline and thatLIFU produced region-specific effects. Both PI and aMCC neuromodulation reduced subjective pain ratings and significantly decreased S2 amplitude relative to sham, whereas LIFU to AI had no effect. Critically, only PI neuromodulation enhanced sensory gating by reducing the S2/S1 ratio. These findings identify the PI as a key contributor to gating of repetitive nociceptive input and a promising neuromodulation target for remediating sensory gating deficits in nociplastic pain.

Identifiers

PMID41646659
PMCPMC12870490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.