ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Endovascular treatment of pediatric ruptured intracranial dissecting aneurysm: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are uncommon in children, with an incidence of 1%-5%. However, intracranial dissecting aneurysms (IDA) account for a higher proportion (20%-50%) of all aneurysms in this age group. Pediatric IDAs typically result from vascular wall injury, potentially associated with genetic predisposition, congenital defects, or trauma. These lesions most commonly present with ischemic stroke, while subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is relatively rare. Early symptoms include headache and vomiting, with severe cases potentially leading to neurological deficits. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Timely diagnosis and intervention are critical for improving prognosis. Treatment options include pharmacological therapy, endovascular intervention, and microsurgical repair. This report details a case of a 14-year-old male diagnosed with a dissecting aneurysm in the communicating segment of the left internal carotid artery (ICA). Emergency endovascular intervention with coil occlusion of the parent artery was performed. Short-term follow-up demonstrated favorable outcomes without new neurological deficits. The clinical characteristics of this condition are briefly reviewed in the context of this case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.