Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646648›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Robotic evolution from Si to Xi in rectal cancer assessing operative performance and oncological outcomes.

Wenpeng Wang, Shan Gao, Jinghao Huang, Duo Yun, Jiefu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenpeng Wang *Department of Colorectal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Shan Gao *Department of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Jinghao Huang *Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Duo YunCancer Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiefu WangDepartment of Colorectal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes between robotic surgical platforms (Si vs. Xi) in rectal carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 86 robotic rectal cancer resections (Si: Results: Among 86 patients with comparable baseline clinicopathological variables (all Conclusions: Compared with Si, the Xi platform confers measurable perioperative advantages-shorter operative time, less blood loss, and reduced hospitalization-without compromising short-term oncologic quality or survival. In low rectal tumors, Xi may facilitate sphincter preservation under comparable baselines. Long-term outcomes appear driven primarily by disease stage rather than platform generation.

Indexed as

postoperative complicationsprognosisrectal neoplasmsroboticsrobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID41646648
PMCPMC12868149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.