Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646642›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2026

Evolution of phenotypic plasticity owing to migration.

Davorka Gulisija, Mitchell Newberry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Davorka GulisijaDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, United States.
Mitchell NewberryDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity enables organisms to produce better-suited phenotypes when the environment changes, improving fitness under adverse conditions. Yet responding to environmental cues may provide little use in a constant environment, where organisms already express optimal phenotypes. The forces that sustain plasticity and account for its widespread presence, thus, remain unclear, as plasticity must remain advantageous to persist. Although typically associated with changing environments, maintenance of plasticity requires generational turnover such that parents and offspring regularly encounter different conditions. Here, we demonstrate that even a low number of migrants between locally adapted populations, in constant environments, can promote the emergence and persistence of phenotypic plasticity even when plasticity is costly and never associated with the fittest genotype, independent of its genetic architecture. We support this conclusion by exploring the parameter space of a two-locus, two-deme model using stochastic simulations and analytical approximations. We derive analytical conditions under which plasticity is adaptively maintained as a function of selection strength, migration, and fitness trade-offs. These findings reveal new potential evolutionary origins of plasticity and offer insight into how maladaptive traits can invade adapted populations in stable environments.

Indexed as

migrationphenotypic plasticitypopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID41646642
PMCPMC12870872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.