Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646636›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2026

Joint test of historical vs. contemporary biogeography supports abundant center hypothesis shaping spatial patterns of self-fertilization.

Mackenzie Urquhart-Cronish, Ken A Thompson, Amy L Angert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mackenzie Urquhart-CronishDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
Ken A ThompsonCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Amy L AngertDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant reproductive assurance describes the ability of a plant to successfully reproduce in an environment that is potentially devoid of conspecifics and/or pollinators. Traditionally, studies have focused on contemporary ecology-pollinator or mate availability-driving spatial patterns in reproductive assurance; however, historical processes-post-glacial range expansion-may be an understudied alternative explanation because during range expansion, selection should favor individuals with traits promoting reproductive assurance (i.e., autonomous selfing or clonal reproduction) at the range edge. While historical tests would be rooted in phylogeographic analyses, the role of contemporary ecology can be tested indirectly using the abundant center hypothesis, where it is assumed population density decreases from the range center toward marginal habitat. We used Northern pink monkeyflower-

Indexed as

abundant center hypothesisBaker's LawErythrantheMimulusphylogeographyplantsrange expansionreproductive assurance

Identifiers

PMID41646636
PMCPMC12870883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.