ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Interpretable multimodal reasoning for robo-advisory: the FinErva framework.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of robo-advisory and quantitative investment has been accompanied by persistent concerns about limited personalization and the opacity of black-box models operating on multimodal financial information. This paper addresses these issues from a decision-support perspective by constructing FinErva, a multimodal chain-of-thought dataset tailored to financial applications. FinErva comprises 7,544 manually verified question-answer pairs, divided into two economically relevant tasks: contract and disclosure understanding (FinErva-Pact) and candlestick-chart-based technical analysis (FinErva-Price). Building on this dataset, the paper propose a two-stage training framework: Supervised-CoT Learning followed by Self-CoT Refinement, and apply it to eight vision-language models, each with fewer than 0.8 billion parameters. Empirical results show that those lightweight models approach the performance of finance professionals and clearly outperform non-expert investors. Overall, the findings indicate that appropriately designed multimodal chain of thought supervision enables interpretable modeling of key research tasks such as contract review and chart interpretation under realistic computational and deployment constraints, providing new data and methodology for the development of personalized, explainable, and operationally feasible AI systems in investment advisory and risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.