ArticleCureus2026
Perception of Undergraduate Medical Students on Elective Posting Block-2: A Relative Importance Index Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The elective module is a new addition to the undergraduate medical curriculum in India, in which students choose the specialty on their own, where they are required to spend eight weeks. This study aimed to assess students' perception regarding their elective posting in Block-2 through the use of the Relative Importance Index (RII). Methodology This cross-sectional study included undergraduate students. Data were collected from 181 participants by using an online structured Google Forms questionnaire. Students were asked to provide their perception on elective posting Block-2 on five domains, i.e., learning benefits, role of preceptor and teamwork, satisfaction with the elective, perceived electives, and negative response, and the statements were ranked through calculation using the RII. Results The RII revealed that the most important domains were the role of preceptors and teamwork (0.65), followed by negative response (0.52), satisfaction with electives (0.45), learning benefits (0.43), and perceived electives (0.42). Conclusions Students perceived the role of preceptor and teamwork as the most important domain. The success of elective posting lies with the effort of medical teachers to execute and implement in such a novel way that each student becomes a lifelong learner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.