ArticleCureus2026
Improving Referral and Continuity of Care Through Structured Outpatient Disposition Planning Enabled by Electronic Referrals: A Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Outpatient visit closure in our institution lacked a standardized disposition process, resulting in referral and follow-up decisions that were frequently communicated verbally and not reliably documented or operationalized in the electronic medical record (EMR). This led to poor visibility of inter-clinic outpatient referrals, fragmented continuity of care, and limited operational oversight. This lack of structured disposition planning introduced risks of delayed diagnoses, duplicated care, and unplanned external referral. Methods A quality improvement intervention was implemented in a tertiary hospital to redesign outpatient disposition planning by embedding a standardized inter-clinic outpatient referral order within the EMR. Referral entry at visit closure triggered real-time operational follow-up by a centralized referral coordination team. The primary outcome was the number of documented inter-clinic outpatient referrals per week. Secondary outcomes included referral outcomes and time from referral entry to first patient contact. Data were analyzed over a 35-week post-implementation period. Results Baseline referral documentation averaged fewer than two referrals per week. Following implementation, the number of weekly documented referrals increased rapidly and was sustained at a mean of over 800 referrals per week. A total of 15,891 inter-clinic outpatient referrals were recorded during the study period. Of these, 8,423 referrals (53.0%) were new consultations and 7,093 referrals (47.0%) were follow-up referrals. Referral outcomes showed that 3,726 referrals (23.4%) resulted in scheduled outpatient appointments and 7,948 referrals (50.0%) resulted in same-day access or direct admission, yielding 11,674 referrals (73.5%) with a completed next step. Referrals that did not progress included 3,006 patient cancellations (18.9%), 581 referrals with unsuccessful patient contact (3.7%), and 588 referrals placed on hold at the patient's request (3.7%). The referral coordination team covered approximately 90% of outpatient operational hours and successfully contacted 12,713 referred patients (80.0%) within nine minutes of referral entry. Conclusions Redesigning outpatient visit closure to include structured, EMR-embedded disposition planning substantially improved the documentation, execution, and reliability of inter-clinic outpatient referrals. By converting informal referral decisions into actionable system processes supported by real-time operational follow-up, the intervention strengthened continuity-of-care processes and improved referral closure without disrupting clinic operations. Structured outpatient disposition represents a scalable strategy to reduce care fragmentation and enhance coordination in high-volume outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.