ArticleData in brief2026
Survey data on students' perceptions, knowledge, and use of learning analytics (LA) and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for the personalization of learning.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This data article describes the dataset from the project ``Teacher Mediation in the Integration of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Compulsory Secondary Education: Evidence, Strategies, and Practices for the Personalization of Education'' (MedIAP). The aim of this research project is to analyse students' perceptions, knowledge, and use of Learning Analytics (LA) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for the personalization of learning in compulsory secondary education in Catalonia. Data were collected through an online survey, resulting in a final sample of 982 secondary education students. The description of the dataset in this article is structured in two main parts. The first provides a descriptive analysis of all survey items, presented using tables and figures. The second focuses on the construction of measurement scales, developed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG-CFA). This dataset will be of interest to researchers across various disciplines, particularly those focused on Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.