Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646504›Full record

ArticleProceedings of meetings on acoustics. Acoustical Society of America2025

Spectral weights for localization and speech-in-speech recognition: Does phonemic content of speech targets matter?

Emily Buss, Richard Freyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of meetings on acoustics. Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Richard FreymanDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.

Funding

Spatial Hearing in Complex Sound FieldsR01DC001625 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FREYMAN, RICHARD L · 1992 to 2024
$6.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent study from our lab showed that normal-hearing adults rely on cues in the region of 0.5-1 kHz for target talker localization and speech-in-speech recognition when the target can only be identified based on spatial cues. The present study evaluated whether similar weights are observed for speech-in-speech recognition that relies on access to vowels or consonants, given differences in the distributions of cues required for vowel and consonant recognition. Spectral weights were estimated by filtering stimuli into 1-octave-wide bands, dispersing those bands on the horizontal plane, and assessing the association between each band's position and participants' responses. Data were obtained for two tasks: 1) localization of the target relative to the masker (left vs. right), and 2) closed-set word recognition, where response alternatives differed either with respect to the initial consonant, vowel, or final consonant. As observed previously, weights for both tasks peaked at 0.5-1 kHz for all three stimulus sets. This result is consistent with the idea that the spatial cues supporting spatial release from masking are similar regardless of the frequency regions containing speech cues required for correct recognition of the target.

Identifiers

PMID41646504
PMCPMC12872218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.