Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646484›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025

Single-cell RNA sequencing via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for pancreatic tumors uncovered an aggressive subclone with a poor prognosis.

Y-Y Su, M-Y Lin, S M Cheng, W-L Chang, C-W Hsu, C-M Yeh, C-C Yu, Y-C Hou, C-J Huang, Y-S Liu and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05767697 (Explore the Correlation of Genomics and Prognosis in Alimentary Tract Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05767697 unknown statusnot on this map

Explore the Correlation of Genomics and Prognosis in Alimentary Tract Cancers

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNational Health Research Institutes, TaiwanRan2020 to 2025Enrolled1,000ConditionsGI Cancer, Liver Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A New CA19-9 Cutoff Value Identifies Lewis Antigen Status and Refines Prognostic Stratification in PDAC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Y-Y SuNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
M-Y LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
S M ChengNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
W-L ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
C-W HsuDepartment of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
C-M YehNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
C-C YuNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Y-C HouCollege of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
C-J HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Y-S LiuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan.
Y-J ChaoDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
D-Y HwangNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Y S ShanDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
L-T ChenNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful tool which can unveil regulatory connections between genes and cells. However, due to the high demand for tissue quality, most scRNA-seq for pancreatic cancer is carried out by surgical specimen. This study (NCT05767697) aims to gain practical experience in carrying out scRNA-seq using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). Materials and methods: With a within-subjects design, two punctures from the same lesion, with a negative pressure of 5 ml (suction group) and without applying suction (non-suction group), were evaluated. Each biopsy sample was separated into three parts: white tissue, red material, and buffer for living cell counting. scRNA-seq was carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol. The pancreatic adenocarcinoma dataset in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was used as external validation. Results: A total of 20 patients with 40 specimens were enrolled. The suction group achieved a success rate of 80% (16/20), which was significantly higher than the 10% (2/20) success rate in the non-suction group ( Conclusions: EUS-FNB with a negative pressure of 5 ml is feasible for scRNA-seq in clinical practice. A UBE2C high-expression subclone correlates with a poor prognosis, potentially becoming a new therapeutic target in future studies.

Indexed as

pancreatic cancertranscriptome analysistumor heterogeneityUBE2C

Identifiers

PMID41646484
PMCPMC12836601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.