Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646483›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025

Anti-EGFR re-challenge with chemotherapy in RAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (A-REPEAT study): efficacy and correlations with tissue and plasma genotyping.

J Sgouros, A Eliades, K Papadopoulou, N Korfiatis, D Papamichael, E Fountzilas, E Tsolaki, A Achilleos, K Tsangaras, C Loizides and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

J SgourosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Center and Genaral Hospital, Athens, Greece.
A EliadesMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
K PapadopoulouLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
N KorfiatisDepartment of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece.
D PapamichaelBank of Cyprus Oncology Center, Nicosia, Cyprus.
E FountzilasDepartment of Medical Oncology, St Luke's Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
E TsolakiLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
A AchilleosMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
K TsangarasMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
C LoizidesMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
G OikonomopoulosSecond Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
T MakatsorisDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece.
E KypriMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
M IoannidesMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
G KoumbarisMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
G FountzilasAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
P C PatsalisMedicover Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
G PentheroudakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approved treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients pretreated with two lines of therapy are of limited efficacy. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) re-challenge might represent an option in RAS wild-type tumours. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-EGFR re-challenge strategies (panitumumab/chemotherapy). Materials and methods: RAS wild-type metastatic CRC patients following first-line chemotherapy + anti-EGFR agent and second-line chemotherapy ± anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent were eligible. Panitumumab with irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was used. The primary objective was response rate (RR). Secondary objectives were safety, progression-free survival and overall survival. Next-generation sequencing-based genotyping in archived tissue and plasma was carried out to identify prognostic factors. Results: The study closed prematurely, due to poor accrual, with 23 patients included. Most patients had primary tumours in the left colon/rectum, and the liver was the most common metastatic site. Treatment modifications were required in 74% of patients due to side-effects primarily, neutropenia and acneiform rash. One patient died from hepatic failure. The objective RR in the intention-to-treat population was 13%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52%. Forty-eight percent of patients tested via liquid biopsy had Conclusion: Panitumumab/chemotherapy as an anti-EGFR re-challenge strategy had modest activity in our patient cohort.

Indexed as

anti-EGFR re-challengecolorectal cancerpanitumumabRAS wild type

Identifiers

PMID41646483
PMCPMC12836756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.