Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646476›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025

Maintenance chemotherapy in biliary tract tumours in the era of immuno-chemotherapy.

A Lamarca, J Adeva, I Ales Díaz, R Alvarez Gallego, A J Muñoz Martín, T Macarulla Mercade

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A LamarcaDepartment of Medical Oncology-OncoHealth Institute-Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias FJD, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
J AdevaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Digestive Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
I Ales DíazMedical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain.
R Alvarez GallegoCentro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, HM Sanchinarro, Facultad HM de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.
A J Muñoz MartínMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
T Macarulla MercadeVall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Vall d'Hebrón Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract tumours (BTCs) are malignancies with a poor prognosis. Regarding first-line therapy options, cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) alone has been the standard therapy option for more than a decade. This has changed recently, due to the incorporation of immunotherapy into this combo, with latest studies showing how the addition of immunotherapy with either durvalumab or pembrolizumab can improve patients' outcomes. However, the adequate duration of CisGem in advanced BTCs has remained an open debate. We provide a detailed summary and discussion on current evidence in terms of adequate duration of chemotherapy in the immuno-chemotherapy era, with the aim of informing best practice. Based on the data available and summarised here, the differences are small and individual decisions should be pursued for the sake of not compromising the bone marrow reserve for delivering second-line therapies. In the era of immuno-chemotherapy, maintenance chemotherapy seems to be of very limited benefit and maintenance with the checkpoint inhibitors being utilised seems sufficient. For patients being treated with chemotherapy alone, maintenance chemotherapy should also be carefully considered and decisions individualised.

Indexed as

biliary tract tumourschemotherapydurationmaintenance

Identifiers

PMID41646476
PMCPMC12836684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.