ArticleThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa2026
Clinical audit of psychotropic medication use at a South African intellectual disability hospital.
Article in The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) are often prescribed psychotropic medications at disproportionately high rates, particularly for managing psychiatric symptoms or behaviours that challenge (BTC). International guidelines emphasise cautious, evidence-based use and the prioritisation of non-pharmacological interventions. Aim: This audit evaluated prescribing practices at a specialist psychiatric hospital in South Africa to determine the extent of alignment with internationally recommended standards for psychotropic use in individuals with ID. Setting: Outpatient department (OPD) of an advanced psychiatric care institution in Cape Town. Methods: A retrospective folder and prescription review was conducted for 103 patients with ID who were newly referred between January 2018 and August 2019. Prescribing decisions at the first visit and 6-month follow-up were assessed against guidance from the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Results: Psychotropic medications were prescribed to 88% of patients. Antipsychotics were the most frequently used agents, comprising over half of all prescriptions, often for BTC in the absence of a psychotic disorder. While certain elements of guideline-based care were evident - such as use of low effective doses - gaps were noted in documentation of rationale, review scheduling, side-effect monitoring and consistent use of behavioural strategies. These areas highlight opportunities for strengthening practice. Conclusion: This audit emphasises the complexity of psychotropic prescribing for individuals with ID and the need for structured, multidisciplinary approaches to ensure safe and appropriate medication use. Contribution: Embedding standard protocols and regular reviews into clinical workflows may support better adherence to international best-practice standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.