ArticleThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa2026
Validation and improvement of the mental health literacy scale to assess undergraduate nursing students in South Africa.
Article in The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental Health Literacy (MHL) refers to knowledge, skills and attitudes related to mental health and is often measured by the revised Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS). This scale has been validated on a group of primary healthcare (PHC) workers in Zambia and South Africa, but its usefulness for a group of nursing students has not been investigated until now. Aim: To investigate the psychometric properties of the revised scale for a group of undergraduate nursing students at a South African university, while also assessing the level of MHL in the group under investigation. Setting: Nursing students ( Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted between July 2023 and August 2023, using a purposive sampling technique. A socio-demographic data form and a revised version of the MHLS were used to collect data online. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to analyse the data. Results: The EFA and CFA seemed to confirm a new 5-factor structure, including only 17 items. This structure holds similar factors to the MHL subscales. The reliability of most of the new factors was good, with two factors that need further intervention. This version of the MHLS proposed satisfactory levels of MHL for this group. Conclusion: This study proposes a shortened, 5-factor structure version of the MHLS to be used to assess nursing students. Contribution: The revised 5-factor structure measure can potentially identify gaps in the MHL of students, and this can inform appropriate interventions to address the MHL needs in South Africa generally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.