ArticleResearch square2026
Using GeoAI and Machine Leaning Tools for Consistent High-Resolution Land Cover Mapping Based on Time-Series NAIP Imagery.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Context: High-resolution land-cover maps are essential for ecological monitoring and landscape-level analysis, yet long-term high-resolution time-series products remain scarce. The National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) provides highly valuable aerial imagery, but strong temporal heterogeneity across years, primarily caused by shifts in sensor characteristics, limits the ability to generate consistent multi-year land cover maps. Objectives: This study aims to (1) develop an algorithm capable of producing spatially detailed and temporally coherent 1-m land-cover maps using the state-of-the-art GeoAI/Machine Learning (ML) tools based on time-series NAIP imagery, and (2) address cross-year sensor characteristic shifts without relying on historical training samples. Methods: We designed a dual-track adaptive workflow that applies different strategies to NAIP imagery with different qualities. NAIP imagery collected during 2009-2017 has a higher quality than that collected during 2004-2008. Images from the high-quality years were classified using a foundation model pretrained with U-Net/ResNet-34 and refined with a Segment Anything Model (SAM) for accurate boundary delineation. Images collected in the earlier years were reconstructed using an NLCD-based spatiotemporal bridging and label back-casting pipeline. Accuracy was evaluated across six U.S. counties in North Carolina and Pennsylvania. Results: The algorithm produced stable results across years, yielding overall accuracies of 0.874 (2014), 0.848 (2017), and 0.788 (2004) with Kappa statistics at 0.860, 0.831, and 0.764, respectively. Structure, Water, Wetland, and Cropland exhibited consistently high F1-scores, while performance in low-quality imagery remained coherent despite substantial sensor differences. These findings demonstrate that the algorithm maintains both spatial fidelity and temporal consistency across heterogeneous historical imagery. Conclusions: This study shows using GeoAI/ML tools along with multiple sources of data can effectively produce consistent high-resolution multi-decade land-cover maps based on NAIP imagery. The approach developed in this study provides a scalable solution for generating high-resolution time series land-cover maps across the conterminous USA where NAIP imagery is available, supporting long-term land-change analyses and landscape-level planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.