ArticleResearch square2026
Violence Exposure, Mental Health, Cognitive Functioning, and Disabilities in Incarcerated Youth.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The goal of the present study was to ascertain incidence rates of violence exposure (VE) and disabilities in a population of incarcerated male adolescents using records searches, survey research, and individual academic and cognitive testing. Method: A sample of 115 incarcerated male youth completed self-reported measures of VE, including adverse childhood experiences (ACE), child abuse and neglect, interpersonal Violence experiences (IPV), and community violence exposure (CV), and current functioning and individual testing of cognition and disability diagnosis (both cognitive and mental health). Results: Two-thirds of the participants reported high ACE, 90% experienced at least mild physical abuse, and one-third reported severe prior sexual abuse (SA) using the CTQ. Over 60% had a prior disability in their records, and over 75% were diagnosable during individual cognitive testing. Just over 50% of youth were diagnosable with a mental health diagnosis, and with cognitive disabilities, the incidence rate increased to 85% of the population. Youth with disabilities had higher rates of VE. Conclusion: Few studies combine data related to prior VE, disability diagnosis using individual measures, and test for current cognitive functioning in incarcerated youth. The present study determined that high rates of disability were largely driven by cognitive and academic disabilities, rather than mental health problems, indicating a pervasive problem with cognitive disabilities in youth who are incarcerated. Cognitive disabilities, particularly in youth with prior histories of VE, are an intervention point that has the potential to reduce recidivism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.