ArticleResearch square2026
Fork Reversal Safeguards Epigenetic Inheritance During Replication Stress.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During DNA replication, epigenetic information carried by histone modifications is faithfully propagated and re-established on sister chromatids, ensuring cell identity. Chromatin reassembly is tightly coupled to DNA replication, however, whether and how perturbations to DNA replication affects the fidelity of epigenetic inheritance remain unclear. In this study, we reveal a critical role for replication fork reversal in maintaining the transmission of epigenetic information under replication stress. Cells defective in fork reversal exhibit reduced nucleosome density at replication forks, accompanied by the loss of parental histones during their transfer onto nascent DNA. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that PrimPol activation leads to single-stranded DNA gaps in fork reversal deficient cells, and that subsequent PARylation (poly ADP-ribosylation) and DNA-protein crosslinking on these gaps cause nucleosomes loss. Our findings demonstrate that replication fork reversal, a widespread physiological process, is not only essential for preserving genome integrity but also for safeguarding epigenetic stability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.