ArticleResearch square2026
Semi-Supervised Clustering for Identification of MCI and Dementia Cohorts with a Brief Digital Cognitive Assessment.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional neuropsychological assessment for diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia requires a lengthy in-clinic evaluation by a specialist. This creates a substantial patient burden and prolonged diagnostic and treatment timelines. Digital cognitive assessments (DCA) offer a scalable solution to meet these challenges, but their validation is challenged by the scarcity of large, high-quality datasets with established ground truth. We applied a semi-supervised model-based clustering method to combine a large dataset (N=1189) of the Digital Assessment of Cognition (DAC), a brief, remote-capable DCA, with a smaller dataset pairing DAC assessments with ground-truth neuropsychological diagnoses (N=248). The resulting model identified cognitively unimpaired, MCI, and dementia groups with high accuracy on an external test dataset. Congruent validity was established through strong expected associations with traditional analog assessments. These results validate prior exploratory work and demonstrate the potential for more nuanced, holistic, and scalable cognitive assessments in non-specialist settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.