ArticleResearch square2026
Amyloid Probability in Alzheimer Disease From Plasma, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Amyloid Imaging.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers are increasingly used to triage patients for amyloid confirmation, yet performance is often reported versus a single comparator despite discordance between amyloid PET and CSF. In a cross-sectional secondary analysis of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), we assembled one PET-anchored PET-CSF-plasma triad per participant (n = 320). Bayesian latent class models integrating PET, CSF and plasma (Aβ42/40 or %p-tau217) estimated pattern-level posterior probabilities of latent amyloid positivity, with prespecified sensitivity analyses for PET-CSF conditional dependence, timing gaps (≤ 7, 8-30, > 30 days) and CSF cutpoints. Concordant PET+/CSF + and PET-/CSF - patterns mapped to probabilities near 1 and 0, whereas discordant patterns yielded intermediate probabilities refined by plasma strata and most sensitive to dependence assumptions. PET-CSF discordance occurred even within ≤ 7 days (12/98; 12%). A CSF Aβ42 coverage analysis showed similar gradients. Pattern-to-probability reporting may aid interpretation without privileging a reference test.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.