ArticleResearch square2026
Utilizing the NIMHD Framework to Explore Barriers and Facilitators to Lung Cancer Screening Among Black Adults in NYC.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with Black individuals experiencing the highest incidence and mortality rates. Despite the benefits of early detection through low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), lung cancer screening rates remain disproportionately low among Black adults. This study explores barriers and facilitators to inform culturally tailored interventions that promote equitable screening uptake. Methods: Guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) research framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with screening-eligible Black adults in New York City (NYC). Participants were recruited through community canvassing and stakeholder partnerships. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis to identify key themes across individual, interpersonal, community, and societal levels. Results: Analysis of 11 interviews identified four key thematic constructs inclusive of participants' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening in the Black community. Preparation is concerned with community members' lack of knowledge about lung cancer and screening, and strategies for community outreach and education. Partnership emphasizes the ways in which discrimination, mistrust, and stigma impact how the Black community engages in healthcare and other collaborative relationships to promote uptake of lung cancer screening. Prioritization highlights individual and community perceptions of healthcare and screening prioritization and demonstrates a need for greater prioritization of lung cancer screening in the healthcare setting. Finally, placement stresses the importance of embedding screening services within communities for improved access. Conclusion: Addressing lung cancer screening disparities requires multilevel strategies that enhance provider communication, expand access, and engage community partners. Culturally responsive approaches, such as social network engagement, mobile screening units, stigma reduction, and targeted education are essential to increasing awareness and early detection in Black communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.