ArticleResearch square2026
Enhancing the Implementation of a high-quality randomized trial in pregnancy.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02434380 (Effect of Vitamin D Replacement on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Vitamin D Replacement on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Pregnant Women With Hypovitaminosis D
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Conducting clinical trials in pregnant women is essential to address pregnancy-related health issues, yet remains challenging. Hypovitaminosis D is widespread during pregnancy, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Thus, vitamin D supplementation has been suggested as a therapeutical route to alleviate the symptoms of hypovitaminosis, but its effects remain undetermined. Objective: This paper presents our experience conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy in Lebanon. We describe encountered challenges, strategies to address them, and key elements related to internal and external validity. Methods: We presented descriptive data derived form a double-blind randomized controlled trial in pregnant women from two centers in Lebanon. We outlined the challenges faced during the trial implementation, and our approach to address them. We detailed our strategies to ensure external validity by referencing key issues identified by Rothwell (2006). We highlighted key factors related to the internal validity of the trial using the five risk-of-bias domains from the Cochrane tool for RCTs. Results: Of 552 pregnant women screened, 60% enrolled; 88.5% completed the delivery visit, and 35.8% completed the one-month postpartum visit. Adherence to the intervention exceeded 90% in both arms. Major challenges included recruitment (35% declined participation) and center-specific dropout rates (12% vs. 7%, p = 0.004). Additional barriers included low acceptability of neonatal bone mass scans (35.8%), variability in fetal measurements, and motion artifacts in neonatal imaging. To improve external validity, we used a robust design and recruited from two centers with differing social contexts. Internal validity was strengthened through proper randomization, high adherence, minimal missing data, standardized outcome assessments, and avoidance of reporting bias. Consistent implementation and active follow-up across centers further supported study integrity. Conclusion: RCTs in pregnancy require culturally sensitive recruitment, physician engagement, and strong participant relationships. Participant-centered strategies improve adherence, reduce bias, and enhance both internal and external validity. Trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov (Trial registration number NCT02434380). URL of the registration site https//classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02434380.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.