Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646328›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Colorectal cancer screening test preferences by sociodemographic factors and health beliefs in diverse underserved populations.

Aasma Shaukat, Taranika Sarkar Das, Jahnavi Udaikumar, Xucong Meng, Mahnoor Khan, Ayesha Nasir, Sarah Miller, Mark Pochapin

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aasma ShaukatNew York University Langone Medical Center.
Taranika Sarkar DasNew York University Langone Medical Center.
Jahnavi UdaikumarNew York University Langone Medical Center.
Xucong MengNew York University Langone Medical Center.
Mahnoor KhanMount Sinai Medical Center.
Ayesha NasirNew York University Langone Medical Center.
Sarah MillerMount Sinai Medical Center.
Mark PochapinNew York University Langone Medical Center.

Funding

STANDOUT in Behavioral Cancer Prevention and Control Research: Summer Training Accelerating and Nurturing the Development of Outstanding Undergraduate TraineesR25CA260125 · NCI · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI Joel Erblich, Jennifer S Ford · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS029429NCI NIH HHS R25 CA260125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of multiple screening options, rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remain suboptimal. With recent approval of a blood test for CRC screening, there is an urgent need to understand screening preferences of populations with low screening rates. Methods: Between October 2023 and June 2024, we conducted a survey among adults aged 45-75 at ambulatory primary care clinics across multiple community health centers and federally qualified healthcare centers across the city as well as in community settings regardless of prior screening. Results: A total of 1,014 individuals completed the survey. Respondents were 12.8% Black/African American, 51.6% White, 23.4% Hispanic, 15.8% South Asian, and 4.2% Asian. Overall, the highest test preference was for screening colonoscopy (45.5%) followed by blood test (29.9%). Colonoscopy was preferred by individuals under age 70 (47.5%), while stool-based (20.2%) and blood-based (31.9%) tests were the most preferred among above 70 years (p = 0.0429. Whites (54.6%), Blacks (44.6%), and Hispanics (35.9%, p < 0.001) preferred colonoscopy, while Asians (37.2%) and South Asians (24.4%) favored blood tests. Factors associated with preference for a colonoscopy over other screening tests were younger age: respondents aged below 70 years were more likely to prefer colonoscopy, compared to respondents aged above 70 years (OR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.20-2.47], p = 0.003); Nonsmoker compared to former/current smokers (OR = 2.04, 95% CI: [1.10-3.94], p = 0.028); Having undergone a prior colonoscopy (OR = 6.83, 95% CI: [4.52-10.6], p = < 0.001) or not having a prior stool test (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: [1.52-2.11], p = < 0.001). Factors associated with preference for a blood test over other screening tests were education level: respondents without any college experience were more likely to prefer blood test compared to respondents with college experience (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.02-2.07, p = 0.038); Nonsmoker compared to former/current smokers (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: [1.00-2.99], p = 0.048); Never undergone a prior colonoscopy (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: [1.23-2.51], p = 0.002). Factors associated with preference for a stool test over other screening tests were: age over 80 years compared to respondents aged below 80 (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 1.67-6.55, p < 0.001); respondents with college experience were more likely to prefer blood test compared to respondents without college experience (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.02-2.66, p = 0.048). Conclusion: The study underscores importance of patient preference in deciding which tests to offer. Tailored strategies addressing demographic, socioeconomic, and health belief barriers are needed to improve CRC screening adherence.

Identifiers

PMID41646328
PMCPMC12869558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.