ArticleResearch square2026
Anatomically constrained liver CT anomaly detection using healthy priors with diffusion-based inpainting.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting subtle focal liver lesions on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is challenging in routine clinical practice, especially for small, low-contrast, or morphologically heterogeneous tumors acquired under variable protocols. While fully supervised liver tumor segmentation can achieve high accuracy, it requires pixel-level annotations that limit scalability and generalizability. Reconstruction-based anomaly detectors trained without hepatic anatomical constraints reduce label burden but are sensitive to textural variability, contrast-phase differences, and produce noisy, unstable boundaries. We introduce an anatomically constrained, four-stage pipeline for liver CT anomaly detection: (1) a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) trained on unremarkable axial slices to learn a healthy prior; (2) diffusion-based inpainting within an automatically segmented whole-liver mask to generate pseudo-normal liver appearance; (3) a compact encoder-decoder trained with a liver-masked, mean squared error loss to reconstruct healthy liver tissue from paired original and inpainted inputs; and (4) a liver-scoped difference map between the original and reconstructed healthy CT slices as the final anomaly score for localization. Trained exclusively on > 13,000 healthy CT slices and evaluated on 1,000 abnormal CT slices from 109 Liver Tumor Segmentation (LiTS) benchmark patients, the method achieves Dice 0.596, intersection-over-union 0.482, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.861, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance 80.5 pixels (px). Performance improves with lesion size, with a Dice score of 0.796 for the largest quartile. Anchoring anomaly detection to hepatic anatomy with a stable healthy prior yields data-efficient liver lesion localization suitable for CT triage and prioritization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.