Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646318›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Anatomically constrained liver CT anomaly detection using healthy priors with diffusion-based inpainting.

Eshan Joshi, Yongyi Shi, Albert Montillo, Matthew Lewis, Ron Peshock, Ge Wang, Samuel Achilefu

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eshan JoshiUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Yongyi ShiRensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Albert MontilloUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Matthew LewisUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Ron PeshockUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Ge WangRensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Samuel AchilefuUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
NANOPHOTOSENSITIZERS FOR REGENERATIVE PHOTOTHERAPYR01CA260855 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ACHILEFU, SAMUEL · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Imaging Goggles for Fluorescence-Guided SurgeryR01EB030987 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ACHILEFU, SAMUEL, BURAS, WILLIAM ROBINSON · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260855NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting subtle focal liver lesions on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is challenging in routine clinical practice, especially for small, low-contrast, or morphologically heterogeneous tumors acquired under variable protocols. While fully supervised liver tumor segmentation can achieve high accuracy, it requires pixel-level annotations that limit scalability and generalizability. Reconstruction-based anomaly detectors trained without hepatic anatomical constraints reduce label burden but are sensitive to textural variability, contrast-phase differences, and produce noisy, unstable boundaries. We introduce an anatomically constrained, four-stage pipeline for liver CT anomaly detection: (1) a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) trained on unremarkable axial slices to learn a healthy prior; (2) diffusion-based inpainting within an automatically segmented whole-liver mask to generate pseudo-normal liver appearance; (3) a compact encoder-decoder trained with a liver-masked, mean squared error loss to reconstruct healthy liver tissue from paired original and inpainted inputs; and (4) a liver-scoped difference map between the original and reconstructed healthy CT slices as the final anomaly score for localization. Trained exclusively on > 13,000 healthy CT slices and evaluated on 1,000 abnormal CT slices from 109 Liver Tumor Segmentation (LiTS) benchmark patients, the method achieves Dice 0.596, intersection-over-union 0.482, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.861, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance 80.5 pixels (px). Performance improves with lesion size, with a Dice score of 0.796 for the largest quartile. Anchoring anomaly detection to hepatic anatomy with a stable healthy prior yields data-efficient liver lesion localization suitable for CT triage and prioritization.

Indexed as

anomaly detectioncomputed tomographydiffusion modelsgenerative artifcial intelligenceunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41646318
PMCPMC12869632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.