ArticleResearch square2026
Automated Cerebral Edema Detection using Electroencephalography in Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To develop an electroencephalography (EEG) based machine learning model to identify diffuse cerebral edema in post-cardiac arrest patients and to evaluate its ability to predict edema prior to radiographic detection. Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of adult patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest (2016-2024) who underwent both neuroimaging and EEG monitoring as part of routine clinical care. Machine learning models using Transformer and Long Short-Term Memory architectures were trained to Results: Among 124 patients in the detection model, median age was 53 years, and 74 (59.7%) were male. Sixty-five patients (52.4%) developed diffuse cerebral edema. The best-performing detection model, a Transformer using 4-hour EEG segments, achieved strong performance (AUC 80.0%, accuracy 80.0%, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 90.0%). In a secondary analysis of 19 patients with diffuse cerebral edema and 19 matched referents, the top-performing prediction model used 8-hour EEG segments (AUC 92.2%, accuracy 90.6%, sensitivity 100%, specificity 88.9%). Conclusion: Diffuse cerebral edema can be identified in survivors of cardiac arrest using machine learning models applied to routine EEG data. In this study, a Transformer based approach demonstrated superior performance for both detection of established edema and identification of EEG patterns that preceded radiographic recognition than LSTM. With validation in larger and independent cohorts, this strategy may enable earlier recognition of evolving cerebral edema during standard EEG monitoring and support timely interventions to mitigate secondary brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.