ReviewESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025
Screening for second primary tumors in the aerodigestive tract in non-Asian populations with head and neck cancer - systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for second primary esophageal cancer after head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Incidence, treatment variation, and survival of synchronous head and neck and esophageal carcinomas: a descriptive nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients diagnosed with a primary tumor in the esophagus, lungs, or head and neck are at an increased risk for developing second primary tumors (SPTs) in these regions. Most studies on SPT prevalence focus on Asian populations, with limited data available for non-Asian groups, leaving the utility of screening unclear. This review aims to assess the yield of screening for SPTs in non-Asian populations following a primary tumor in these regions. Patients and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies on screening for esophageal, lung, or head and neck SPTs after a primary tumor diagnosis in any of these sites. The primary outcome was the prevalence by screening of all diagnosed SPTs in the esophagus, head and neck or lungs. Results: Due to limited data on screening for SPTs after esophageal or lung tumors, this review focused solely on screening after primary head and neck tumors. A total of 26 studies with 8071 patients from non-Asian countries were included. The pooled prevalence for all SPTs was 5.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1% to 7.2%]. The pooled prevalence for esophageal SPTs individually was 5.3% (95% CI 3.7% to 7.7%), for head and neck SPTs 4.6% (95% CI 1.0% to 18.1%) and for lung SPTs 4.0% (95% CI 2.6% to 6.2%). Most SPTs were detected in combination with an index hypopharynx carcinoma (60.0%). The proportion of synchronous (45.3%) and metachronous (54.7%) SPTs was similar. Conclusion: Endoscopic screening for esophageal SPTs in non-Asian countries should be considered, especially in patients with a primary hypopharynx carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.